An agentic system that ingests a contract, compares each clause to a firm's standard, redlines deviations with reasoning, and produces a marked-up draft a junior associate can hand to a partner.
Claude APIModel Context Protocol (MCP)pgvector (clause database)Next.jsVercel deploy
What it does
Parses a contract into structured clauses (parties, obligations, remedies, governing law)
Compares each clause against a firm-specific standard library via RAG
Redlines non-standard language and explains why it deviates
Cites internal precedent and statutory language inline
Generates a partner-facing summary memo at the top of the redline
Tracks an audit trail of every flagged change for the associate's review
Co-Teaching Faculty
Law fellow archetype (sample profile)
Practicing attorney · Northwestern Pritzker Law
Our pre-law track is co-taught by a working law fellow — recruited from Northwestern Pritzker School of Law or a leading regional litigation or transactional firm — alongside a senior software engineer. Your child learns from an attorney who has lived inside the contract-review workflow, and who can articulate what a partner actually wants from a junior associate's first redline. The mentor relationship continues past the program: pre-law students who perform well receive a personal letter of recommendation and direct introductions into the broader practitioner network.
“Students leave understanding what a partner reads first in a redline — and what citations earn the trust of a busy attorney.”
Curriculum Deep-Dive
Week 2 — Legal AI deep-dive
The pre-law cohort splits off from the shared Week 1 foundations and works directly with the law fellow on contract structure, citation systems, and the framing problems unique to legal AI.
01Clause taxonomy and contract parsing — turning prose into structured data
02Citation-grounded retrieval — surfacing internal precedent and statutory authority
03Redline reasoning patterns — why a clause deviates and what the firm's position should be
04Partner-facing summary memos and the etiquette of a junior-associate handoff
05Hands-on architecture review with the law fellow: framing, hallucination control, audit trails
06Capstone scoping: pick a real contract type (NDA, MSA, employment), write the spec, agree on an evaluation rubric
Week 1 foundations are shared across all 5 tracksWeek 3 builds + admissions coaching
Sample student work
What your child could build.
Sample capstone projects illustrating the scope of Pre-Law work. Inaugural cohort is Summer 2028 — these are not real-alumni outcomes.
Sample student work — Maya R. (rising 11th)
NDA redline agent for a small-firm partner
Built an agent that compares incoming NDAs to a firm's standard form, redlines deviations, cites the partner's prior negotiation positions, and produces a 3-line summary at the top of the redline.
Claude + pgvector + Next.js + Vercel
Sample student work — Daniel K. (rising 12th)
Employment agreement comparison agent
Built an agent that reads two competing employment offers and produces a side-by-side comparison memo flagging non-standard clauses, citing relevant state law, and recommending negotiation priorities.
Claude + LangGraph + Postgres + Streamlit
Why this track wins for admissions
A capstone an admissions reader can verify.
An admissions reader at a top pre-law university — Ivy League undergraduate, accelerated 3+3 J.D., or BA-with-pre-law-track program — is looking for the rare applicant who can argue a position with structure, cite authority for it, and engage with the actual mechanics of legal practice. Most strong pre-law applicants present debate trophies, mock-trial wins, and student-government leadership — all important, all common. Far fewer can sit across from an interviewer and discuss the design tradeoffs in contract-review automation, the role of citation grounding in trustworthy legal AI, or how a junior associate actually hands work to a partner. Your child finishes the program with a working contract-review agent at a personal URL, an architecture writeup an admissions reader can verify, and a Common App essay built around the project — a piece of writing that makes their interest in law specific, structured, and verifiably their own.